Welfare Maximization with Deferred Acceptance Auctions in Reallocation Problems
نویسنده
چکیده
We design approximate weakly group strategy-proof mechanisms for resource reallocation problems using Milgrom and Segal’s deferred acceptance auction framework: the radio spectrum and network bandwidth reallocation problems in the procurement auction setting and the cost minimization problem with set cover constraints in the selling auction setting. Our deferred acceptance auctions are derived from simple greedy algorithms for the underlying optimization problems and guarantee approximately optimal social welfare (cost) of the agents retaining their rights (contracts). In the reallocation problems, we design procurement auctions to purchase agents’ broadcast/access rights to free up some of the resources such that the unpurchased rights can still be exercised with respect to the remaining resources. In the cost minimization problem, we design a selling auction to sell early termination rights to agents with existing contracts such that some minimal constraints are still satisfied with remaining contracts. In these problems, while the “allocated” agents transact, exchanging rights and payments, the objective and feasibility constraints are on the “rejected” agents.
منابع مشابه
On the Near-Optimality of The Reverse Deferred Acceptance Algorithm
This mathematics honors thesis provides an analysis of the optimality of the “Reverse Deferred Acceptance Algorithm” created by Paul Milgrom and Illya Segal for the Federal Communications Commission auction for spectrum licenses. We begin by first providing a general literature review of combinatorial auctions, including algorithmic attempts at solving such optimization problems. A description ...
متن کاملEnvy-Free Sponsored Search Auctions with Budgets
We study the problem of designing envy-free sponsored search auctions, where bidders are budgetconstrained. Our primary goal is to design auctions that maximize social welfare and revenue — two classical objectives in auction theory. For this purpose, we characterize envy-freeness with budgets by proving several elementary properties including consistency, monotonicity and transitivity. Based o...
متن کاملA Comparative Study of Multi-Attribute Continuous Double Auction Mechanisms
Auctions have been as a competitive method of buying and selling valuable or rare items for a long time. Single-sided auctions in which participants negotiate on a single attribute (e.g. price) are very popular. Double auctions and negotiation on multiple attributes create more advantages compared to single-sided and single-attribute auctions. Nonetheless, this adds the complexity of the auctio...
متن کاملCS364A: Algorithmic Game Theory Lecture #5: Revenue-Maximizing Auctions∗
over all feasible outcomes (x1, . . . , xn) in some set X. Revenue is generated in welfaremaximizing auctions, but only as a side effect, a necessary evil to incentivize participants to report their private information. This lecture begins our discussion of auctions that are explicitly designed to raise as much revenue as possible. We started with the welfare objective for several reasons. One ...
متن کاملCombinatorial Auctions with Online XOS Bidders
In combinatorial auctions, a designer must decide how to allocate a set of indivisible items amongst a set of bidders. Each bidder has a valuation function which gives the utility they obtain from any subset of the items. Our focus is specifically on welfare maximization, where the objective is to maximize the sum of valuations that the bidders place on the items that they were allocated (the v...
متن کامل